Is Bootstrap Dead? How Tailwind Took Over—and What’s Next for CSS Frameworks
Table of Content
Let me start by saying this: I’ve been in the web development game long enough to remember when Bootstrap was the framework everyone talked about. If you were building a website back in the early 2010s and didn’t use Bootstrap, people would look at you like you’d just announced you hand-code everything in Notepad.
But as with all things tech-related, trends change, tools evolve, and new kids show up on the block (looking at you, Tailwind). So, is Bootstrap still relevant today? Let’s dive into it.
The Rise of Bootstrap: A Walk Down Memory Lane
Bootstrap, created by Mark Otto and Jacob Thornton at Twitter in 2011, wasn’t just another CSS framework—it was revolutionary. Before Bootstrap, if you wanted a responsive website, you had to roll your own grid system or rely on clunky solutions that often broke under pressure. Bootstrap changed the game by offering:
- A Grid System: Remember floats? Yeah, those painful little things we used to align elements before Flexbox came along. Bootstrap gave us a 12-column grid system that made responsiveness feel almost… easy.
- Pre-Styled Components: Buttons, forms, modals, navbars—you name it, Bootstrap styled it for you. It was like having a designer in your pocket.
- Customizability via LESS/SASS: Developers could tweak variables to match their brand colors without starting from scratch.
And then there was Themeforest. Oh man, Themeforest. Entire businesses thrived selling pre-built templates based on Bootstrap. Need an eCommerce site? Done. Portfolio? Easy. Corporate landing page? Sure thing. For years, Bootstrap-powered themes ruled the internet.
But here’s the kicker: while Bootstrap made life easier, it also led to a lot of cookie-cutter websites. Everyone started looking the same because they were the same—just slightly reskinned.
Why Many Developers Are Dropping Bootstrap
Fast forward to today, and you’ll notice fewer developers reaching for Bootstrap out of habit. Here’s why:
a) Overused and Generic
As mentioned earlier, Bootstrap templates created a sea of identical-looking sites. Even though customization options existed, many devs stuck to default styles because “it works.” Clients noticed too—they’d visit one site and see the exact same button hover effect on another.
b) Heavy File Sizes
Bootstrap comes packed with tons of features—not all of which you need. Including the entire library adds unnecessary bloat to your project, slowing down load times. Modern performance standards demand leaner codebases.
c) Outdated Patterns
While Bootstrap has evolved over time (hello, Flexbox utilities!), its legacy baggage remains. Its older versions relied heavily on floats and clearfix hacks, which feel archaic compared to modern layout techniques like CSS Grid and native Flexbox.
d) Learning Curve vs. Alternatives
For beginners, Bootstrap can seem overwhelming due to its sheer size and complexity. Meanwhile, newer frameworks offer simpler, more intuitive approaches to styling.

Bootstrap VS Tailwind: Why We Choose Tailwind Over Bootstrap
Enter Tailwind CSS, the rebellious teenager who stormed onto the scene and disrupted the status quo. Unlike Bootstrap, Tailwind doesn’t ship with pre-designed components. Instead, it gives you low-level utility classes that let you build completely custom designs directly in your HTML. Here’s how Tailwind flips the script:
a) Freedom to Be Unique
No more default buttons or generic cards. With Tailwind, every design decision is intentional. You’re not limited by someone else’s vision—you create exactly what you want.
b) Lightweight & Modular
Tailwind uses PurgeCSS to strip unused styles during production, resulting in incredibly small file sizes. This makes it perfect for performance-focused projects.
c) Faster Development Workflow
Once you get past the initial learning curve, Tailwind speeds up development significantly. No more switching between files to write CSS—you style everything inline using class names.
d) Future-Proof
Tailwind embraces modern CSS practices like Flexbox and Grid natively, ensuring compatibility with current and future web standards.
Don’t get me wrong—Bootstrap isn’t dead. In fact, it’s still widely used in enterprise environments where stability and familiarity matter more than cutting-edge innovation. But for startups, freelancers, and creatives pushing boundaries, Tailwind has become the go-to choice.



Did Bootstrap Recover Yet?
Here’s the honest truth: Bootstrap hasn’t disappeared—it’s just playing a different role now. The latest version (v5 as of writing) ditched jQuery dependencies, added better support for CSS variables, and improved accessibility. These updates make it faster, lighter, and more developer-friendly.
However, recovering market share against Tailwind feels like an uphill battle. Tailwind’s philosophy aligns perfectly with today’s demands for uniqueness, speed, and efficiency. That said, Bootstrap still holds value in specific scenarios:
- Legacy Projects: If you’re maintaining a site built on Bootstrap v3 or v4, sticking with Bootstrap might save you headaches.
- Rapid Prototyping: Need something quick and functional? Bootstrap’s pre-styled components shine here.
- Teams with Mixed Skill Levels: Not everyone knows CSS inside-out. Bootstrap provides a safety net for less experienced developers.
So yes, Bootstrap recovered—but only partially. It found its niche, but it’s no longer the dominant force it once was.
Recommendations: Which Framework Should You Choose?
If you’re starting fresh or revamping an existing project, consider these factors:
Choose Bootstrap If:
- You need a stable, tried-and-tested solution.
- Your team lacks deep CSS expertise.
- You’re working on a corporate/internal tool where aesthetics aren’t critical.
Choose Tailwind If:
- You prioritize performance and customization.
- You enjoy crafting unique designs without relying on pre-built components.
- You’re comfortable investing time upfront to learn Tailwind’s syntax.
Other Options Worth Exploring:
- Bulma: A lightweight alternative to Bootstrap with a clean, modern aesthetic.
- Foundation: Similar to Bootstrap but with more flexibility for advanced layouts.
- Chakra UI: Perfect for React developers seeking accessible, component-based styling.
- UnoCSS/Atomic CSS Libraries: For those who love Tailwind’s approach but want even smaller bundles.

Final Thoughts
The evolution of CSS frameworks mirrors the broader tech industry: constant innovation, fierce competition, and shifting priorities. While Bootstrap paved the way for responsive web design, Tailwind represents the next chapter—a shift toward minimalism, modularity, and creative freedom.
As developers, our job is to adapt and choose the right tools for each project. Whether you stick with Bootstrap, embrace Tailwind, or experiment with emerging libraries, remember this: the best framework is the one that helps you deliver exceptional results efficiently.
What do you think? Are you Team Bootstrap, Team Tailwind, or exploring other options? Drop your thoughts in the comments—I’d love to hear them!